As the cryptocurrency industry moves toward 2026, narratives around competition, dominance, and “coin wars” are gaining ground once again. However, a growing number of analysts and community voices argue that this framework fundamentally misunderstands how the Web3 ecosystem is evolving. A recent perspective shared by Twitter user @DoLieu_Pi offers a clear and compelling counterpoint: 2026 will not be a war between currencies, but a division of roles.
This view challenges the common habit of comparing every emerging network to Ethereum. For years, Ethereum has been treated as a benchmark for smart contracts, decentralized finance, and Web3 infrastructure. While this comparison may make sense for some projects, applying the same lens to the Pi Network creates confusion rather than clarity. According to this framework, Ethereum and Pi Network are not competitors. They are designed to solve completely different problems.
Ethereum is positioned as the backbone of global finance close to Web3. Its ecosystem focuses on decentralized finance, stablecoins, capital markets, institutional staking, and complex rules-based systems. Ethereum handles money at scale, abstracted from everyday human behavior. It is optimized for protocols, liquidity, composability and financial engineering. In simple terms, Ethereum processes money.
Pi Network, on the other hand, is described as a Web3 life economy. Their focus is not on complex financial instruments but on their everyday use. Everyday payments, lifestyle apps, real users and real-world behavior form the core of its design philosophy. Pi Network cares less about how institutions move capital and more about how everyday people live with money. In this sense, Pi processes how humans use money.
Understanding this distinction is critical for anyone trying to evaluate the future of cryptocurrencies. Ethereum’s role requires technical sophistication, regulatory navigation, and deep integration with existing financial systems. It is aimed at developers, financial institutions, and advanced users who interact with decentralized applications that mirror or extend traditional finance.
Pi Network’s target audience is fundamentally different. It is designed for the general public, including users who may have never interacted with cryptocurrency before. By enabling participation via mobile devices and emphasizing accessibility, Pi Network lowers the barrier to entry for Web3 adoption. This approach reflects the belief that mass adoption will not come from financial complexity, but from simplicity and relevance to daily life.
The mistake many observers make is trying to evaluate the Pi Network using Ethereum metrics. When Pi is viewed through the lens of DeFi volume, total value locked, or smart contract complexity, it may appear incomplete or underdeveloped. However, this comparison ignores the intended role of the Pi Network. Pi is not trying to replace Ethereum, replicate its ecosystem, or compete for the same users.
The statement “Seeing Pi as Ethereum means misunderstanding Pi” captures this idea succinctly. Each network has its own logic, architecture and success criteria. Ethereum thrives in environments that require programmable money and institutional-grade infrastructure. Pi Network aims to thrive in environments where ease of use, trust, and community-driven utility are paramount.
 |
| Source: Xpost |
This division of roles also reflects a broader maturation of the crypto industry. In its early years, cryptocurrencies were dominated by the idea that one blockchain would rule them all. Over time, it has become clear that specialization is not a weakness but a necessity. Just as the global economy depends on different systems for wholesale finance, retail payments and consumer services, Web3 will require multiple networks that serve different functions.
The concept that Ethereum and Pi Network do not replace or exclude each other reinforces this idea. They are complementary layers of a broader digital economy. Ethereum can support complex financial flows and institutional adoption, while the Pi Network can enable daily transactions and user engagement at scale. Together, they address different dimensions of how value moves in a digital world.
From a Web3 adoption point of view, this separation may be essential. Many crypto projects struggle because they try to serve everyone at once. By clearly defining its role, Pi Network avoids direct competition with established financial blockchains and instead focuses on building a parallel economy centered on daily life. This clarity could become a strategic advantage as the market becomes more crowded.
Critics often point to Ethereum’s maturity as a reason to rule out alternative models. However, maturity in one area does not guarantee suitability in another. The systems that power global finance are not always suitable for everyday consumer use. High fees, technical complexity, and abstract interfaces can limit adoption among mainstream users. The Pi Network’s design choices suggest an awareness of these limitations.
The year 2026 is often cited as a turning point because it represents a period in which Web3 is expected to move beyond experimentation and move toward practical integration. By then, users will care less about which Coin dominates the headlines and more about which networks actually improve their lives. In this context, the idea of a “currency war” becomes less relevant than the question of functional relevance.
For Pi Network, success will not be measured by surpassing Ethereum in financial metrics. It will be measured based on whether people use Pi Coin for payments, services, and daily interactions. Merchant adoption, ecosystem applications, and user trust will matter more than DeFi statistics. This represents a different, but equally important, definition of success.
The continued evolution of Ethereum will also play a crucial role. As it strengthens its position in global finance, it may increasingly look like a financial operating system rather than a consumer platform. This specialization does not diminish its importance. Instead, it reinforces the argument that Web3 needs multiple layers, each optimized for a specific purpose.
In conclusion, framing 2026 as a battle between currencies oversimplifies the future of cryptocurrencies. The perspective shared by @DoLieu_Pi highlights a more nuanced reality: Ethereum and Pi Network are not rivals fighting for dominance, but rather systems playing different roles in an increasingly complex Web3 economy. Ethereum handles money at an institutional and protocol level. Pi Network handles how humans live with money. Confusing these roles leads to misunderstanding both projects. Recognizing their differences may be the key to understanding where Web3 is really headed.
hokanews – not just cryptocurrency news. It’s cryptoculture.
Writer @Victory
Victoria Haleis a pioneering force in the Pi Network and a passionate blockchain enthusiast. With first-hand experience setting up and understanding the Pi ecosystem, Victoria has a unique talent for breaking down complex developments in the Pi Network into engaging, easy-to-understand stories. It highlights the latest innovations, growth strategies, and emerging opportunities within the Pi community, bringing readers closer to the heart of the evolution of the crypto revolution. From new features to analysis of user trends, Victoria ensures that each story is not only informative but also inspiring for Pi Network enthusiasts everywhere.
Disclaimer:
HOKANEWS articles are here to keep you up to date on the latest rumors in crypto, technology, and more, but they are not financial advice. We share information, trends and knowledge, we don’t tell you to buy, sell or invest. Always do your own homework before making any money moves.
HOKANEWS is not responsible for any loss, gain or chaos that may occur if you act on what you read here. Investment decisions should arise from your own research and, ideally, the guidance of a qualified financial advisor. Remember: cryptocurrencies and technology move fast, information changes in the blink of an eye, and while we strive for accuracy, we cannot promise that it is 100% complete or up-to-date.