The cryptographic industry, based on promises of transparency and empowerment, once again faces a tough verification of reality. A project that once rode in the wave of community bombs and ideals of “fair distribution” is now under fire, with users accusing it of betrayal and manipulation. The project in question? Blum CryptoA name that has changed hope to warning.
In social networks, voices are increasing and none stronger than that of the cryptographic commentator @jantabraizthat they did not chop words in their viral publication:
“You did scam to all who trusted your project, especially Airdrop Ordinary farmers.”
A full year of “mining”, only to receive 35 chips?
Blum Crypto’s Airdrop campaign attracted thousands of farmers, influencers and anxious community members, promising a “fair distribution” through a “first mining” system. Users spent months doing homework, promoting the project and participating in the telegram to accumulate mining points, waiting for an assignment that changes life.
What did they receive? According to generalized reports, 90% of the participants received only 35 tokens – A number so small that was perceived as an insult at the time invested by supporters.
To add salt to the wound, Blum introduced a claim condition That only allows users to claim 30% of these tokens immediately, while the remaining 70% can only be claimed later six months. If users do not claim within 180 days, their tokens will burn.
 |
| Source: x |
“What type of reward system is that?” @jantabraiz asked, echoing the frustration of thousands.
The controversy of Vladimir Smerkis: a shaded past
He doesn’t stop there. Questions about Blum’s integrity were deepened when reports arose that link their former co -founder, Vladimir Smerkisto an alleged one FRUD CASE OF $ 15 MILLION. While the details are still being developed, the Blum leadership association with financial misconduct is a serious red flag in an industry that already fights trust problems.
The optics is devastating: a project that promoted itself as a community centered is now linked to accusations of poor management, questionable rewards structures and a collapseing token price.
Airdrop’s culture faces a calculation
For years, Aerial drugs They have been used by cryptographic projects to start user bases and build buzz. The model is simple: distribute tokens to early supporters and let the effect of the network drive adoption.
However, as many community members are now realizing, this model is deeply defective:
-
False promises: Many projects promise generous rewards but offer insignificant amounts.
-
Blocked chips: Tokens often come with complex claim conditions that make users make their rewards.
-
Market landfills: Projects can use airdrops for temporary exaggeration before quickly throwing tokens in exchanges, the prices they block.
-
Lost time: Users invest “mining” of significant time through tasks and promotions, only to receive minimum yields.
As @jantabraiz emphasized, “Telegram Airdrops is no longer worth it, and Blum has demonstrated it.”
The drop in the price of Token: a predictable result
The Blum Crypto token, once promoted with visions of public services and growth driven by the community, has seen its collapsed value. Critics argue that this was inevitable, given the defective distribution mechanics and the absence of organic demand.
By forcing users to claim tokens for a prolonged period, Blum aimed to avoid massive liquidations. However, without a robust demand mechanism, the delayed claim structure simply extends the timeline of the decomposition of prices instead of solving the underlying problems.
A betrayed community
The cryptographic community, based on ideals of decentralization and justice, feels betrayed. For many, Blum was not just another speculative record; It was a promise of inclusion and reward for its participation.
The reaction is growing, with calls to the responsibility and transparency that echoes on social networks. The hashtag #Blumscam It is beginning to circulate, as users share their disappointment and demand responses.
“Share this publication, label @blumcrypto and write ‘Blum Scam’. Let’s make the scope,” said @jantabraiz, asking for collective action.
What does this mean for the future of Airdrops?
Blum Crypto’s controversy is not an isolated incident; It is symptomatic of a major problem within the Web3 ecosystem. Airdrops, once seen as a democratizing force, have become more and more to tools for projects to generate short -term exaggeration without offering durable value.
If the cryptographic industry must mature, you must address the following:
-
Transparent reward structures: Projects must clearly communicate the value and claim conditions of Airdrops in advance.
-
Responsibility: Projects linked to controversial figures or past fraud should clarify their associations to avoid deceiving their communities.
-
Focus on utility: Tokens must have genuine cases beyond speculation to maintain their value after air.
-
Regulatory supervision: As the industry grows, regulatory frameworks may need to address deceptive distribution practices to protect users.
The industry reacts
Following Blum’s controversy, influencers, community leaders and web builders are taking stock. The incident serves as a marked reminder that Crypto, Coin Projects, Picoin News, Web3 Initiatives and Genai Innovations You must prioritize transparency to generate trust.
Many see this as a turning point: the community requires higher standards or runs the risk of repeating the same cycle of exaggeration and disappointment.
The call for change
As the dust sits, a truth remains clear: the community deserves better.
Projects must remember that Crypto is about empowering people, not exploiting their enthusiasm. Blum Crypto scandal is a care call for developers, investors and users equally.
It is time for cryptographic space to move beyond empty promises, the exaggeration of the airdrop and exploitation, adopting the real utility and transparent practices that are aligned with the decentralized ideals on which this industry was built.
Conclusion: Lessons learned
The mismanagement of Blum Crypto of its Airdrop distribution has exposed the low belly of cryptography marketing strategies. The reaction of the community, directed by voices such as @jantabraiz, highlights a growing impatience with the projects that do not meet their promises.
Crypto, Coin Projects, Picoin News and Web3 Enthusias should use this time to advocate higher standards, ensuring that participation in the ecosystem is rewarded quite transparent, transparent and sustainably.
As the industry progresses, let the Blum Crypto episode serve as a reminder: Trust is obtained, it is not demanded. And once lost, it is difficult to recover.
Writer
@Ellena
Ellena is an experienced cryptographic writer who loves to explore the intersection of blockchain technology and financial markets. She regularly provides information about the latest trends and innovations in the currency space.
See other news and articles on Google News
Discharge of responsibility:
The articles published in Hokanews are intended to provide updated information on various topics, including cryptocurrency and technology news. The content on our site is not intended to be an invitation to buy, sell or invest in any asset. We encourage readers to conduct their own research and evaluation before making an investment or financial decision.
Hokanews is not responsible for any loss or damage that may arise from the use of the information provided on this site. Investment decisions must be based on an exhaustive investigation and advice of qualified financial advisors. Information about Hokanews can change without prior notice, and we do not guarantee the precision or integrity of the published content.
