Following the recent approval of the Genius Law, a historical piece of cryptocurrency legislation, the main platforms such as Coinbase and Paypal have found a way to continue offering yields in stable clouds, despite the growing regulatory restrictions.
The Genius Law, signed last month, introduced a comprehensive regulatory framework for the stable in the United States. Although it seeks to improve transparency, investor protection and financial stability, the law specifically restricts Stablecoin issues of offering interests or performance characteristics to customers. However, the law seems to have left a critical lagoon, one that Coinbase and Paypal are using active and strategically.
Stablecoin’s performance dilemma
The stable, such as USD Coin (USDC) and PayPal USD (Pyusd), are digital assets linked to the value of fiduciary currencies. Although initially low volatility vehicles for trade and storage value in cryptographic space are considered, more and more have been used to generate passive income for holders through programs that contain interest.
 |
| Source: x |
According to the Genius Law, Stablecoin issuers are prohibited from offering interests directly to customers unless they comply with banking regulations. Justification is simple: the characteristics that contain interest make these digital assets look like traditional savings products, potentially blurring the line between values and currency. The United States government wants to avoid systemic risks and shadow banking products that lack adequate supervision.
However, in a development that has increased curiosity and controversy, Coinbase and PayPal have continued to offer yields that range from 3.7% to 5% in their respective stable holdings. How are they doing this legally?
The legal escape or the intelligent structure?
The answer is found in the structure of reward programs. According to public statements and legal interpretations shared by the companies, Coinbase and Paypal argue that they are not the issuing of the stables they support. For example, while the USDC is offered in Coinbase, it is technically issued by Circle, a separate entity. Similarly, Pyusd is marked under PayPal but issued by Paxos Trust Company.
 |
| Source: x |
Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, clarified in a recent statement: “We do not issue USDC. Our performance offers are not interest payments, but part of a rewards program funded through the income of the Coinbase platform.”
Indeed, companies argue that Genius law does not apply to them because they are not offering deposit products similar to a bank. Instead, they distribute a part of their income generated by the platform to users who have Stablcoins in their wallets, under the appearance of a “rewards” program.
This distinction is more than semantics. It serves as the legal basis that allows these platforms to maintain yields while remains technically complying with the new federal law.
PayPal strategic game
Paypal, another dominant player in the landscape of digital finance, is taking a similar route. While Pyusd promotes as part of its expanding ecosystem, it carefully points out that the asset is issued by Paxos, not PayPal. Despite this technicalism, PayPal offers users an annual statement of up to 5% in Pyusd balances.
 |
| Source: x |
According to a company spokesman, “our rewards are not interest in the legal sense. They are part of a promotional strategy to support our users and strengthen our ecosystem.”
This rewards -based model has allowed PayPal to maintain its competitive advantage in the increasingly crowded Stablinin market, attracting retail users and digital finance enthusiasts.
Industry reactions and experts
Industry analysts divide these reward programs really adhere to the spirit of the law.
“This is a classic case of regulatory arbitration,” said Sheila Warren, CEO of the Crypto Council for Innovation. “The platforms are not technically violating the letter of the law, but they are clearly exploiting a gray area. It will be interesting to see if regulators move to close this escape.”
Others argue that this model reflects the type of innovation that crypto was destined to foster.
“As long as there is transparency and consent of users, allowing platforms to share income is not necessarily harmful. In fact, it could be a mutual benefit for platforms and consumers,” said Michael Sung, a regulation professor at Fintech at Nyu Stern.
However, some regulatory voices are less tolerant. According to reports, the officials of the United States stock and values commission (SEC) have marked this model for review, although formal measures have not yet been taken. The SEC has expressed concern about products that offer yields without sufficient investor protections.
Implications of policy in the future
Genius law intended to create clear railings around the use and management of stables, especially in the light of the growing role that these digital assets play in global finances. However, when focusing on the emitters instead of the platforms, the door may have opened without wanting creative interpretations.
The law distinguishes between “issuance” and “distribution”, regulating only the former with strict supervision. The platforms that serve as custodians or intermediaries are largely excluded from the new rules, a fact that Coinbase and Paypal have taken over.
If the current trend continues, Congress can review the legislation to include platform -based performance programs. For now, however, users can still obtain passive income in their Stablecoin holdings, even in a regulatory environment of the post genius law.
Conclusion: Innovation within the regulation
Coinbase and PayPal cases illustrate the complex relationship and evolution between cryptographic innovation and government supervision. While regulators are working to guarantee consumer protection and systemic stability, companies continue to find legal ways to offer value -added services to their users.
It remains to be seen if this practice will resist the test of time or regulates out of existence. But for now, Stablecoin reward programs remain alive and well, driven by the lagoons, but by the precise language of the law.
Writer @ellena
Ellena is an experienced cryptographic writer who loves to explore the intersection of blockchain technology and financial markets. She regularly provides information about the latest trends and innovations in the currency space.
See other news and articles on Google News
Discharge of responsibility:
The articles published in Hokanews are intended to provide updated information on various topics, including cryptocurrency and technology news. The content on our site is not intended to be an invitation to buy, sell or invest in any asset. We encourage readers to conduct their own research and evaluation before making an investment or financial decision.
Hokanews is not responsible for any loss or damage that may arise from the use of the information provided on this site. Investment decisions must be based on an exhaustive investigation and advice of qualified financial advisors. Information about Hokanews can change without prior notice, and we do not guarantee the precision or integrity of the published content.