Jimmy Wales Says Bitcoin Unlikely to Go to Zero, But Questions Its Long-Term Value as Money
Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has weighed in on the ongoing debate over Bitcoin’s long-term future, offering a technically optimistic and economically cautious view.
In a recent public statement, Wales argued that predictions that Bitcoin will crash to zero are likely wrong. The network’s underlying design, he said, is robust enough to continue operating indefinitely unless it faces a catastrophic cryptographic failure or a sustained 51 percent attack. Even in those circumstances, he noted, the system could potentially survive through a fork that restores consensus among participants.
At the same time, Wales expressed skepticism about Bitcoin’s ability to deliver on its original promise as a widely used currency and dominant store of value. Looking ahead, he suggested that by 2050 the price of Bitcoin could fall below $10,000 in today’s terms, possibly much lower, if adoption trends do not materially change.
 |
| Fountain:X Official |
His comments have reignited a familiar tension in the world of digital assets: technological resilience versus economic sustainability.
Technical strength versus economic role
Wales formulated his position around two different ideas.
First, the architecture of the Bitcoin network is solid. The decentralized ledger, cryptographic security model, and distributed mining ecosystem make it difficult to close or remove. As long as participants continue running nodes and miners process transactions, the network can function.
Second, economic value is not guaranteed simply because the technology works. For an asset to maintain purchasing power or serve as money, it must be widely adopted for real-world use.
Wales suggested that while the Bitcoin protocol may endure, its role as everyday money remains uncertain. He characterized the asset primarily as a speculative instrument rather than a broadly integrated payments system.
He also highlighted competition from traditional safe haven assets such as gold, silver, real estate, jewelry and fine arts. These asset classes have centuries of historical trust, tangible ownership structures, and deep pools of liquidity.
From their perspective, these established assets can continue to dominate demand for long-term stores of value.
Market data and adoption trends
Wales’ comments intersect with several measurable trends in the cryptocurrency market.
Bitcoin remains the largest digital asset by market cap, currently trading near $67,734 at the time of writing, reflecting a modest 1 percent drop in the past 24 hours. The short-term move appears consistent with typical volatility rather than a structural collapse.
However, transaction data indicates that a significant portion of Bitcoin activity is related to trading and investing rather than everyday payments. While some merchants accept Bitcoin, global retail penetration remains limited compared to traditional payment networks.
Volatility continues to present challenges to widespread transactional adoption. Large price swings can deter both traders and consumers from using the asset for routine purchases.
However, the counterarguments are substantial.
Institutional participation expands
In recent years, institutional participation in Bitcoin has expanded dramatically. Exchange-traded funds, regulated futures contracts, and large-scale custody solutions have brought digital assets into mainstream finance.
Major asset managers, pension funds and corporate treasuries have gained exposure through regulated investment products. These intermediaries generate revenue by facilitating demand, suggesting that institutional interest remains durable across market cycles.
Wales acknowledged that such products could continue to work even if general public enthusiasm fades. Smaller ETFs and funds may persist with declining volumes, reflecting market resilience rather than explosive growth.
For many institutional investors, Bitcoin is seen as a diversification tool, a digital product or a hedge against macroeconomic uncertainty.
This divergence between retail speculation and institutional allocation complicates long-term forecasts.
Artificial intelligence and real world integration
Wales also noted limited integration with emerging technologies. He noted that AI systems and automation tools have not widely adopted cryptocurrencies as a fundamental infrastructure layer.
In his opinion, this absence suggests that digital assets have yet to achieve deep systemic integration.
Proponents respond that blockchain technology continues to evolve and that integration with AI and decentralized financial ecosystems may accelerate over time.
Still, the observation highlights a broader question: Will Bitcoin’s primary function remain as a speculative store of value or will it expand into broader economic functions?
Could Bitcoin fall towards $10,000?
Wales’ projection of a possible long-term fall towards $10,000 in inflation-adjusted terms represents a substantial fall from current levels.
For such a scenario to materialize, several conditions would likely have to occur simultaneously.
Institutional flows would have to weaken significantly. Retail enthusiasm would have to contract for long periods. Technological innovation within the Bitcoin ecosystem would have to stagnate. Regulatory pressures could further limit adoption.
Additionally, alternative monetary technologies or systems may need to surpass Bitcoin in capital allocation.
However, there are countervailing forces.
Bitcoin benefits from strong network effects, global brand recognition, and established infrastructure. Thousands of developers, exchanges, custodians and financial institutions now support the ecosystem.
The asset’s fixed supply of 21 million coins remains a central pillar of its scarcity narrative. Supporters argue that scarcity combined with growing global liquidity provides a foundation for long-term value.
Safe Haven Competition
Wales’ emphasis on traditional safe-haven assets reflects a broader investment mindset.
Gold, for example, has served as a store of value for millennia. Real estate offers tangible utility along with potential appreciation. Fine art and collectibles maintain cultural value and are motivated by scarcity.
For conservative capital allocators, physical assets may appear safer due to historical precedent.
Bitcoin advocates respond that digital scarcity represents a new form of trust anchored in mathematics rather than physical presence.
This debate over tangible versus digital value continues to shape investor psychology.
Sentiment versus usefulness
Another central theme in Wales’ commentary is the role of feeling.
He suggested that many Bitcoin buyers are primarily motivated by the expectation of future price appreciation rather than daily utility. If speculative interest fades, valuations could decline.
Market history shows that sentiment cycles can drive dramatic price swings. Bull markets often amplify technological revolution narratives, while bear markets emphasize risk and uncertainty.
Long-term sustainability may depend on expanding utility beyond speculation.
The broader debate
Wales’ perspective does not represent a complete rejection of Bitcoin. Rather, it reflects skepticism about its economic trajectory while acknowledging its technical durability.
This nuanced position reflects broader conversations within academia and finance.
Some analysts see Bitcoin as digital gold with long-term advantages tied to macroeconomic trends. Others see it as an experimental asset class subject to cyclical enthusiasm.
The truth may lie somewhere between those extremes.
Conclusion
Jimmy Wales’ comments underscore a fundamental tension in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Bitcoin’s underlying technology appears resilient, but its long-term economic role remains debated.
While predictions of a collapse to zero may be unlikely given the network design, questions remain about sustained adoption and competitive positioning.
Whether Bitcoin remains a speculative instrument, evolves into a widely accepted store of value, or establishes itself in a niche use will depend on innovation, regulatory clarity, and global demand patterns.
As markets continue to mature, discussions around digital assets are shifting from survival to sustainability.
hokanews.com – Not just cryptocurrency news. It’s cryptoculture.