XRP Fining demand: Ripple vs Sec approaches the crucial date, but is it over?
The long legal battle between Ripple Labs and the US stock and values commission “End of demand XRP” It could still take weeks, even if a fundamental closed door meeting in July 3, 2025 It is in favor of Ripple.
The official SEC calendar shows a Closed Door Meeting at 2 PM ET of July 3with “claims of litigation” that appear on the agenda. While this is a routine part of the agency’s operations, it has sent a wave of speculation through the cryptographic community that Ripple’s demand could be reaching its long -awaited resolution.
What is this meeting about?
These closed doors meetings, formally called “Sunshine law meetings” They are where the SC discusss current application issues, litigation strategies and liquidation possibilities. For months, XRP investors and Ripple supporters have been closely tracking these meetings, waiting for signs that the SEC will move to end their legal battle against Ripple, which began in December 2020.
 |
| SOURCE: X. |
However, legal experts caution that simply having “claims of litigation” on the agenda does not guarantee that a liquidation decision for Ripple is taken immediately. The former SEC lawyer, Marc Fagel, explained that these meetings often include updates in cases instead of final votes, and a formal agreement requires additional procedure steps before it becomes official.
The great Ripple movement: to drop the cross appeal
Add fuel to optimism, The CEO of Ripple, Brad Garlinghouse, confirmed on June 27 that Ripple has removed his cross appeal In the current case. This movement means that Ripple will no longer challenge parts of the ruling of the previous court that did not leave, which clears a significant procedural obstacle and indicates the preparation of Ripple to close the chapter.
The community sees this as a positive indicator, since the SEC is now expected to eliminate its own attraction, paving the way for a complete agreement. However, the SEC has not yet confirmed whether it plans to abandon its side of the appeal, and this remains a key factor for any final XRP demand.
What happens if the SEC votes to leave the case?
Even if the SEC uses its July 3 meeting to formally vote to eliminate its appeal, the case does not end instantly. The following process includes:
-
Formal dismissal presentations: Both Ripple and the SEC must submit documents before the court that indicates their mutual agreement to dismiss the case.
-
Judicial approval: Judge Analisa Torres, who supervised the case of undulation from the beginning, will review the presentations to ensure that they are aligned with the procedural standards and the previous decisions.
-
Final order: Only after Judge Torres firm the dismissal will be official, marking the real XRP demand that ends.
Experts point out that this process could take weeks, not dayseven if the internal vote of the SEC occurs on July 3.
Why is July 3 still important for XRP
While a final dismissal approved by the Court may not happen immediately, on July 3 it remains a critical date for Ripple, the XRP community and cryptographic markets.
The mere fact that the “litigation statements” are on the SEC agenda have been enough to Spark Bullish sentimentWith XRP prices seeing an ascending impulse as merchants bet on an imminent end to years of legal uncertainty. Market observers believe that even a strong signal of the SEC could boost the highest XRP prices, with a complete confirmation of the end of the demand that probably generates greater profits.
However, legal analysts warn investors to remain cautious, emphasizing that Only a dismissal approved by the Court will completely resolve the regulatory cloud hanging on the commercial operations of XRP and Ripple in the United States.
A rapid summary of Ripple vs SEC: why this case is important
The demand of the SEC against Ripple began in December 2020, claiming that the sale of XRP of Ripple constituted an offer of values not registered worth more than $ 1.3 billion. Ripple has constantly argued that XRP is a currency, not security and, therefore, falls out of the jurisdiction of the SEC.
The case became a Historical battle for the cryptographic industrywith possible implications on how other cryptocurrencies and tokens -based projects are regulated in the United States. Over time, portions of the case have been inclined in favor of Ripple, including a July 2023 ruling of Judge Torres that found that XRP secondary sales in exchanges did not constitute values transactions.
The current appeal of the SEC and the contrasting of Ripple have prolonged legal uncertainty, impacting the adoption of XRP and Ripple associations within the financial system of the United States.
The impact of the market: why the price of XRP is sensitive to legal developments
The result of the wave demand could establish a precedent for the classification of cryptography in the US, directly affecting how other tokens are regulated. For XRP, a complete dismissal would eliminate an important obstacle for exchange relations in regions where it remains restricted.
In addition, Ripple has made significant movements in cross -border payments and CBDC associations worldwide. He The end of the demand could accelerate Ripple’s efforts to expand associations with banks and payment suppliers in the United States, potentially promoting greater utility and demand of XRP.
Market analysts point out that even speculation on liquidation developments often causes volatility in the price of XRP, with strong increases every time positive legal news arises.
What comes next: the path to the final resolution
From now on, July 3 is the next point of significant control For Ripple’s demand, but investors must wait a process of several steps:
-
Decision of the SC: If the SEC votes to eliminate its appeal will be the main food of the July 3 meeting.
-
Presentation before the Court: If the sec proceeds, both parties will request the dismissal.
-
Judicial review: Judge Torres will evaluate and approve the dismissal presentations.
-
Official conclusion: Once approved, the Ripple vs Sec demand will officially conclude.
Why the cryptographic industry is observing closely
Beyond Ripple, the resolution of this demand could indicate the sec approach for the application of cryptomyon under current leadership. If the SEC goes back to its aggressive position in XRP, it can indicate a more open route for other cryptographic projects that seek clarity around the tokens classification.
At a time when regulatory pressures have intensified worldwide, Ripple’s case is still a chimney for the future Crypto’s regulatory in the United States.
Final thoughts: a step closer, but patience is required
He XRP demand that ends Finally, it can be available, but it is likely that on July 3 marks progress instead of a conclusion. While Ripple drops its cross -appeal signals for closing, the SEC must still take measures, and the court must formally approve the resolution.
For XRP holders and cryptographic markets, the next few weeks will be critical. Whether July 3 bring immediate news or prepare the scenario for the final presentations, the conclusion of this high profile battle will have lasting impacts in Ripple, XRP and the broader cryptographic panorama in the United States.
Writer
@Ellena
Ellena is an experienced cryptographic writer who loves to explore the intersection of blockchain technology and financial markets. She regularly provides information about the latest trends and innovations in the currency space.
See other news and articles on Google News
Discharge of responsibility:
The articles published in Hokanews are intended to provide updated information on various topics, including cryptocurrency and technology news. The content on our site is not intended to be an invitation to buy, sell or invest in any asset. We encourage readers to conduct their own research and evaluation before making an investment or financial decision.
Hokanews is not responsible for any loss or damage that may arise from the use of the information provided on this site. Investment decisions must be based on an exhaustive investigation and advice of qualified financial advisors. Information about Hokanews can change without prior notice, and we do not guarantee the precision or integrity of the published content.
