Memecoin collapse in New York sparks accusations of rug pulling after liquidity outflow
The cryptocurrency market was rocked this week after what many traders are calling an alleged pulling of the New York memecoin rug, following the sudden collapse of a newly launched token promoted by Eric Adams. The token, known as $NYC, surged in value within minutes of its launch, only to crash dramatically after a large portion of its trading liquidity was wiped out at the peak.
The rapid rise and fall have reignited debates over celebrity-backed crypto projects, transparency in token launches, and the growing risks faced by retail investors drawn to hype rather than fundamentals.
A viral launch followed by a sudden collapse
The $NYC token gained instant attention after Eric Adams publicly endorsed the project, framing it as a community-driven initiative with social goals. The endorsement set off a wave of speculation on crypto social media, with traders rushing in as the token went live.
In a very short period, the market capitalization of $NYC reportedly approached $600 million, an extraordinary figure for a new memecoin. Business activity increased as early buyers anticipated quick profits fueled by public attention and association with celebrities.
However, that enthusiasm faded just as quickly.
 |
| Source: Xpost |
On-chain data later revealed that shortly after the price peaked, a significant amount of liquidity was removed from the token’s main trading pool. As liquidity disappeared, selling pressure intensified and the price of the token plummeted by more than 80 percent, falling from around $0.58 to around $0.11 within minutes.
The speed and scale of the drop caused widespread panic among holders and sparked accusations across crypto forums and social platforms.
What prompted the carpet-pulling accusations
In the crypto industry, a rug pull generally refers to a situation where developers or insiders abruptly withdraw liquidity or sell large holdings of tokens, leaving investors unable to exit without serious losses. While proving intent requires research, certain patterns immediately raise red flags.
 |
| Source: Xpost |
Blockchain analysis companies, including look chainidentified a wallet linked to the token’s implementer that removed approximately $3.18 million in USDC liquidity near the peak price.
Liquidity is essential to the health of a token’s market. It allows traders to buy and sell without extreme price swings. When liquidity suddenly withdraws, even modest sell orders can trigger sharp declines, trapping traders in losing positions.
According to user reports shared online, some traders lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in a matter of minutes as outflow liquidity evaporated.
On-chain transparency exposes critical weaknesses
One of the defining characteristics of blockchain technology is transparency. All transactions are publicly visible, allowing anyone to analyze wallet behavior and liquidity flows in real time.
In this case, transparency worked against the project. When traders saw liquidity being removed at the exact moment the token reached its peak valuation, confidence collapsed almost instantly.
Market watchers noted that the sequence of events closely resembled a familiar pattern seen in previous memecoin crashes:
A highly promoted launch generates excitement
Early price increases attract retailers
Liquidity withdraws near the top
The price falls rapidly
Late buyers are left with losses
This pattern does not automatically demonstrate malicious intent, but it has been strongly associated with pulls in the cryptocurrency market.
Token supply concentration raised additional concerns
Beyond the liquidity event, the blockchain data revealed another worrying detail: the concentration of token supply.
About 70 percent of New York City’s total billion tokens were reported to be held in a small number of wallets, including one large reserve address. Such centralization gives a limited group enormous influence over price movements and market stability.
In more established or responsibly structured projects, large allocations are often locked by smart contracts or released gradually to avoid sudden sales. In the case of $NYC, no clear blocking mechanism or vesting schedule was publicly revealed.
Analysts say this lack of safeguards amplified concerns that insiders could move the market at will, further undermining confidence.
Transparency gaps undermined investor confidence
Eric Adams described the token as a project aligned with social causes, including the fight against anti-Semitism and anti-American sentiment. However, key details were missing.
There was no publicly identified nonprofit partner, no clear explanation of how the funds would be managed, and no transparent disclosure of who controlled the main wallets. During interviews, Adams’ explanations about the project’s structure and blockchain mechanics were considered vague.
In crypto markets, trust is built through verifiable information. Clear roadmaps, audited contracts, wallet disclosures and governance models are often expected, particularly for high-profile launches. The absence of these elements contributed to skepticism as the situation developed.
Rug pulling or serious mismanagement
From a legal standpoint, it is important to note that allegations of rug pulling remain unproven. Determining intent requires regulatory review and, potentially, legal proceedings.
However, for affected investors, the distinction between deliberate fraud and extreme mismanagement offers little comfort. The result was the same: liquidity disappeared, prices collapsed and capital disappeared.
Cryptoanalysts often emphasize that markets judge outcomes, not explanations. In this case, the impact mirrored that of classic rug pulls, regardless of the reason.
Broader Implications for Celebrity-Endorsed Tokens
The $NYC incident highlights a recurring problem in crypto markets: the influence of public figures on speculative assets. Celebrity endorsements can generate instant attention and liquidity, but they can also hide fundamental risks.
Retail investors may assume that public figures have scrutinized projects or that their involvement ensures accountability. In reality, endorsements often lack formal oversight or technical scrutiny.
Regulators have increasingly warned about the risks associated with celebrity-endorsed tokens, particularly when disclosures are limited or incomplete. The collapse of the New York dollar may give impetus to calls for clearer guidelines around such promotions.
Lessons for crypto investors
The fallout from the $NYC token offers several clear lessons for market participants:
Liquidity matters as much as price. Monitoring liquidity pools can provide early signs of instability.
Token distribution is essential. Highly centralized supply increases risk.
On-chain data is more reliable than marketing narratives.
Celebrity endorsements are no substitute for transparency and sound token economics.
Experienced traders emphasize that the hype can disappear within minutes, while losses can persist for much longer.
Market reaction and community response
Following the crash, discussion about the $NYC token spread quickly among crypto communities. Some users called for investigations, while others saw the episode as another warning in the memecoin sector.
The broader crypto market showed limited indirect impact, suggesting that traders viewed the event as project-specific rather than systemic. Still, the incident added to growing concerns about uncontrolled token launches and investor protection.
Final thoughts
The collapse of the $NYC memecoin serves as a stark reminder of the risks inherent in speculative crypto assets, particularly those driven by hype and high-profile endorsements rather than transparent fundamentals.
A single wallet share erased hundreds of millions in market value in a matter of minutes, underscoring how fragile trust in digital markets can be. For investors, the message is clear: due diligence, transparency and caution matter far more than celebrity involvement or viral momentum.
hokanews.com – Not just cryptocurrency news. It’s cryptoculture.
