The hope of an accelerated residence in the United Arab Emirates for cryptocurrency enthusiastic Cryptulites.
The Toncoin (Ton) team, associated with the Blockchain project linked to Telegram, had promoted an attractive proposal: participation of $ 100,000 in tons for three years, paying a $ 35,000 processing rate and ensuring a gold visa from the US.
But at a few hours after the ad, the Emirates News Agency (WAM) published statements by the Federal Authority of Identity, Citizenship, Customs and Port Security (ICP), the Bolsa and Public Authority (SCA) and the Regulatory Authority of Virtual Assets (Vara) that reject the claims of tones. According to these agencies, there are No government program that grants Eau gold visas based on cryptocurrency investments.
“The eligibility for residence visas in the EAU is governed by clear and strict regulations not related to any investment of digital assets,” the ICP emphasized, urging the public to trust sources from the official government to avoid falling into deceptive offers.
Not regulated alarms
The rejection has caused broader discussions about the growing tension between the decentralized ambitions of Crypto and the regulatory frameworks of the nations that seek to become leaders in the innovation of Blockchain. While the EAU are advancing with their blockchain strategies and virtual assets, it has emphasized clear guidelines to protect investors and their reputation as a financial center.
The Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) confirmed that the Tancoin gold visa offer has no license or regulated by the authority. This revelation shows doubts about the Ton program, which said it would use decentralized intelligent contracts to administer assets as annual returns of 3-4%.
The lack of regulatory clarity has left potential caution investors, since the program could deceive users to block substantial capital without any guarantee of receiving residence rights in return. Industry observers indicated that the promise of a visa supported by cryptography would require legal frameworks and cooperation with the immigration authorities, which were absent in the Ton offer.
What investors need to know
While the concept of using cryptography to facilitate global mobility has gained traction, the firm denial of the EAU of the Tancoin initiative underlines the risks for investors who browse the offers without the support of the verified government.
The authorities reiterated that expenses in virtual assets are governed by specific laws of the country, and there is No direct link between such transactions and the residence frames currently in their place. They encouraged potential investors to make due diligence and verify claims through official government channels.
The incident serves as a warning story in a fast -evolving digital finance panorama, where the lines between innovation and compliance are blurred.
Short -term exaggeration, long -term uncertainty
In the hours after the initial announcement, the ton price experienced a modest increase driven by exaggeration and speculative emotion between its community. However, the rapid refusal of the regulatory bodies of the EAU has caused concerns about the legal viability of cryptographic projects that try to link the usefulness of tokens with the benefits of the real world.
Analysts warn that, although these initiatives can generate rumors in the short term, they risk regulatory retreat, which could cushion investor confidence and limit adoption unless they are backed by solid legal frameworks and clear government associations.
“There is a growing interest in residence and citizenship programs with cryptographic worldwide, but without formal agreements with governments, these offers can put investors in precarious positions,” said an industry analyst based in Dubai.
The Eau position on crypto and residence
The EAU remain committed to their vision of becoming an innovation center in Blockchain, with Dubai and Abu Dhabi actively exploring the frames for virtual asset licenses, regulation and integration with the financial system. However, the Government has constantly emphasized that, although it admits blockchain technology and regulated cryptographic operations, these initiatives must comply with existing laws, particularly in relation to residence and citizenship.
The recent movements of the EAU include granting licenses to the exchanges of virtual assets under a rod and develop guidelines for virtual asset service providers, underlining their proactive but cautious approach.
The rapid denial of Ton Visa statements highlights the determination of the EAU to maintain regulatory integrity while promoting innovation in the blockchain space.
Examine TON promises: risks and rewards
Tancoin’s team had promoted the Visa program as an opportunity to ensure a 10 -year residence with the following promised benefits:
-
Quick approval in approximately seven weeks.
-
A simple application process with a validity of 10 years.
-
Inclusion of family members (spouse, children and parents) without additional rates.
-
Complete capital efficiency without deductions of assets staked.
-
It is estimated that APY of 3-4% during the three-year rethink period.
-
Decentralized smart contract.
While these promises may seem attractive, industry experts warn that None of these benefits can materialize if the central premise, the residence backed by crypto, the legal validity.
Broader implications for cryptographic mobility initiatives
The incident sheds light on a growing trend where cryptography projects try to merge the usefulness of blockchain with real -world benefits such as residence, travel and citizenship. While some jurisdictions are exploring the regulated roads to integrate cryptography into economic migration programs, these are still exceptions instead of the norm.
The Tancoin Golden Visa saga underlines the need for cryptographic projects to operate within the regulated frameworks when it promises benefits related to the government, especially in regions with strict standards of compliance such as the EAU.
CONCLUSION: A LESSON OF COMPLIANCE AND TRANSPARENCE
The rapid denial of the 10 -year -old Tincoin EAU Gold Visa initiative underlines the critical need for regulatory clarity and surveillance of investors in the cryptographic space. While the promise of merging digital assets with residence benefits is convincing, remains depending on clear legal frameworks, government collaboration and transparent compliance with local regulations.
For now, the Toncoin incident serves as a reminder that, although the cryptographic space continues to innovate, it promises that it sounds too good to be true, especially those that involve rights condemned to the government, it reflects a deeper scrutiny and verification.
As the EAU continue to advance their position as a nation of blockchain-forward, it will do so within a well-defined regulatory structure, which guarantees that the protection of investors and legal compliance remain at the forefront of their digital ambitions.
Writer
@Ellena
Ellena is an experienced cryptographic writer who loves to explore the intersection of blockchain technology and financial markets. She regularly provides information about the latest trends and innovations in the currency space.
See other news and articles on Google News
Discharge of responsibility:
The articles published in Hokanews are intended to provide updated information on various topics, including cryptocurrency and technology news. The content on our site is not intended to be an invitation to buy, sell or invest in any asset. We encourage readers to conduct their own research and evaluation before making an investment or financial decision.
Hokanews is not responsible for any loss or damage that may arise from the use of the information provided on this site. Investment decisions must be based on an exhaustive investigation and advice of qualified financial advisors. Hokaknews information can change without prior notice, and we do not guarantee the precision or integrity of content publication
